Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/12/1996
Snowden v. State
Citations
- 672 A.2d 1017
- 1996 Del. LEXIS 104
- 1996 WL 132137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court has discretion to impose reasonable limits on cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Veasey, Holland, Hartnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-10· cited 115×
- Trump v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-06-09· cited 49×
- Floudiotis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-04-06· cited 43×
- People v. RuddCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-04-28· cited 39×
- Stigars v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-04-01· cited 33×
- Cunningham v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-01-22· cited 23×
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-07-30· cited 22×
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2004-11-09· cited 20×
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-14· cited 18×
- Bentley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-06-11· cited 17×
- Allen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-09-26· cited 15×
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-02-25· cited 9×
- Zuppo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-10-04· cited 7×
- Garden v. SuttonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-08-28· cited 6×
- Binaird v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-02-23· cited 5×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-06-02· cited 5×
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-06-06· cited 4×
- Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-08· cited 2×
- Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-08· cited 2×
- State v. WatsonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2002-07-08· cited 1×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-12-17· cited 590×
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
- United States v. Jackie Presser Harold Friedman and Anthony HughesSixth Circuit· 1988-04-25· cited 193×
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 184×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-11-05· cited 160×
- United States v. Ronald DriscollSixth Circuit· 1992-09-02· cited 118×
- United States v. Xavier BrooksD.C. Circuit· 1992-06-19· cited 108×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-29· cited 98×
- Douglas v. OwensThird Circuit· 1995-03-24· cited 95×
- United States v. Robert KiszewskiSecond Circuit· 1989-06-13· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.