· 7/7/1982
State v. Wiedeman
Citations
- 321 N.W.2d 539
- 1982 S.D. LEXIS 346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collecting cases for the proposition that “unconscionability requires some element of deceptive bargaining conduct present as well as unequal bargaining power” (quotation cleaned up)
- finding unconscionability where a party knows the truth and chooses to misrepresent it
- leaving the unconscionability determination “to the sound discretion of the trial court”
- “The filing of the lien and its ensuing enforcement is one transaction between the hospital supplier and its consumer patient.”
- “The filing of the lien and its ensuing enforcement is one transaction between the hospital supplier and its consumer patient.”
- permitting a KCPA claim for overcharging and duplicate billing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.