Skip to main content
· 7/7/1982

State v. Wiedeman

Citations

  • 321 N.W.2d 539
  • 1982 S.D. LEXIS 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases for the proposition that “unconscionability requires some element of deceptive bargaining conduct present as well as unequal bargaining power” (quotation cleaned up)
  • finding unconscionability where a party knows the truth and chooses to misrepresent it
  • leaving the unconscionability determination “to the sound discretion of the trial court”
  • “The filing of the lien and its ensuing enforcement is one transaction between the hospital supplier and its consumer patient.”
  • “The filing of the lien and its ensuing enforcement is one transaction between the hospital supplier and its consumer patient.”
  • permitting a KCPA claim for overcharging and duplicate billing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.