State v. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in determining whether defendant’s probation should be revoked, court properly considered defendant’s criminal history and determined he was no longer fit for probation
• court may consider defendant’s entire criminal history in determining whether probation should be revoked
• court may consider defendant's entire criminal history in determining whether probation should be revoked
• court properly considered defendant’s criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McElveen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-16· cited 13×
• State v. Eric M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-26· cited 11×
• State v. Boykin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-13· cited 9×
• State v. MAURICE M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-07-28· cited 7×
• State v. Bouteiller
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-01-06· cited 7×
• State v. Young
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-02· cited 7×
• State v. Miller
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-13· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-21· cited 123×
• State v. Huey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-11· cited 86×
• State v. Kinchen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 38×
• State v. Davis
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-01-05· cited 23×
• State v. Rollins
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-01-12· cited 22×
• State v. Ricketts
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-05-09· cited 15×
• State v. Dunbar
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-28· cited 11×
• State v. Samuel
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-03-21· cited 10×
• State v. Gaston
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-12-21· cited 5×