State v. Russell
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2571
Syllabus
The trial court erred in ordering defendant to pay a specific amount of restitution in its judgment entry when it failed to notify the defendant of the amount of restitution at the sentencing hearing. Trial court partially complied with Crim.R. 11 when it incorrectly notified defendant at the plea hearing that his sentence included a discretionary, not mandatory, three-year term of post-release control. Because the record does not demonstrate that defendant was prejudiced by the court's misstatement, defendant has not shown that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and case remanded for resentencing on restitution only.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. MugrageOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-17· cited 2×
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-09· cited 2×
- State v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.