Superior Court of Delaware· 9/13/1972
State v. Rucker
Citations
- 297 A.2d 400
- 1972 Del. Super. LEXIS 222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- possible variation in test results cannot be presented to trier of fact; issue is limited to whether test was administered according to approved protocol
- a properly administered breath test even with a slight variance in calibration is still sufficient to support a conviction of driving under the influence
- trial judge held to have misinterpreted chemical test statute.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KuhlNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-09-05· cited 68×
- State v. DownieSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-01-31· cited 56×
- State v. BjornsenNebraska Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 45×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-12-01· cited 34×
- Barcott v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-09-11· cited 29×
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-11-21· cited 28×
- Sereika v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 28×
- Erickson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-04-29· cited 26×
- Haynes v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 19×
- People v. CamposAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1982-11-09· cited 19×
- Meehan v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 15×
- Nugent v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-07-23· cited 13×
- State v. LentiniNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-02-15· cited 11×
- Kalmakoff v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-02-21· cited 9×
- Hamann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-10-12· cited 9×
- People v. LujanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1983-02-18· cited 7×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-04-06· cited 6×
- Down Under, Ltd. v. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware· 1989-10-31· cited 5×
- State v. MarchantSuperior Court of Delaware· 1986-01-13· cited 1×
- State v. Mark ScisneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-10-16
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.