Skip to main content

State v. Royal

Citations

  • 277 S.W.3d 837
  • 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 248
  • 2009 WL 507202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • second-degree assault and felony DWI were not separate offenses for double-jeopardy purposes; prior convictions required to enhance the DWI offense to a felony did not constitute additional elements of the DWI offense but were enhancements of punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newton, Ellis, Welsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.