State v. Knifong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge as to a verdict director being unconstitutionally vague was not sufficiently specific where counsel argued the verdict director “violates defendant’s due process rights” but did not discuss a specific provision of the Missouri or United States Constitution
• objection to verdict director as “violation of] defendant’s due process rights” not sufficiently specific
• smell of alcohol, watery and bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, difficulty performing field sobriety tests, conduct during stop and at booking station, admission to consuming alcohol with antidepressant and refusal to submit to breathalyzer sufficient to establish intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).