New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/22/1971
State v. Roundtree
Citations
- 285 A.2d 564
- 118 N.J. Super. 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an informant's identity should have been revealed as the informant was an active participant in the transaction and was a material witness on the issue of defendant's guilt
- finding an informant's identity should have been revealed as the informant was an active participant in the transaction and was a material witness on the issue of the defendant's guilt
- \jurors are permitted to find facts based upon the testimony of a single witness whom they find to be worthy of belief.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Kilkenny, Labrecque and Lane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Leonard v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-08-04· cited 35×
- Renzi v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1974-05-01· cited 33×
- State v. VaronaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-07-12· cited 30×
- State v. FlowersSuperior Court of Delaware· 1973-04-16· cited 25×
- State v. ForeshawNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-08· cited 21×
- Sabia v. City of ElizabethNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-12-30· cited 16×
- State v. MaynardWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-03-26· cited 15×
- State v. AguirreNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-01-26· cited 14×
- State v. LittleNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-01-23· cited 9×
- State v. TownsendNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-01-03· cited 6×
- State v. BooneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-08-09· cited 6×
- State v. SalleyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-04-26· cited 5×
- State v. FlorezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-12-08· cited 5×
- State v. CichettoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-10-04· cited 4×
- State v. CooperNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-06-04· cited 4×
- Maudsley v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-07-27· cited 2×
- State, in Interest of HmtNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-05-03· cited 1×
- State v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-20· cited 1×
- State v. MilliganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-10-07
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Howard Ross v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-06-30· cited 266×
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court· 1884-02-04· cited 157×
- Marshall M. Powell v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-08-30· cited 86×
- Sorrentino v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1947-09-04· cited 85×
- Raymond R. Woody v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-08-11· cited 79×
- Narberto Angelo Portomene v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1955-04-27· cited 75×
- United States v. ConfortiSeventh Circuit· 1953-01-13· cited 67×
- State v. DennisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-11-30· cited 55×
- Mitchell v. BassEighth Circuit· 1958-02-26· cited 54×
- United States v. Robert BarnettSixth Circuit· 1969-11-28· cited 47×
- United States v. Alberta LloydSixth Circuit· 1968-08-30· cited 45×
- United States v. Irving NapueSeventh Circuit· 1969-01-13· cited 44×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-07-20· cited 40×
- Marco Antonio Lopez-Hernandez v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1968-05-10· cited 38×
- United States v. Freddie GoldenEighth Circuit· 1971-03-29· cited 37×
- State v. DolceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-01-20· cited 34×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1970-02-09· cited 29×
- Foltz v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 1951-05-28· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.