Maudsley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that nondisclosure was improper where the CI was the only person who participated in a \bogus\ drug transaction that formed sole basis of search warrant application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Maudsley v. State
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-02-27· cited 37×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harlow v. Fitzgerald
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Anderson v. Creighton
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
• Malley v. Briggs
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
• Roviaro v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
• Gomez v. Toledo
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 2,697×
• Dolson v. Anastasia
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-11-17· cited 601×
• State v. Novembrino
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-16· cited 120×
• Cashen v. Spann
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-02-25· cited 81×
• State v. Milligan
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-10-07· cited 62×
• Kirk v. City of Newark
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-01-25· cited 60×
• Rawlings v. Police Dept. of Jersey City
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-13· cited 35×
• State v. Roundtree
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-12-22· cited 24×
• Grodjesk v. Faghani
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-02· cited 19×
• McKinney v. East Orange Mun. Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-10-31· cited 10×
• Plummer v. Department of Corrections
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-11-25· cited 8×