Skip to main content

State v. Ross

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3027
  • 118 N.E.3d 371

Syllabus

The trial court's error in admitting evidence of Ross's prior conviction was harmless error, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the rebuttal testimony, in admitting into evidence posts made on Facebook, or in instructing the jury.

Judges: Schuster, Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.