State v. Ross
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 675
Syllabus
Appellant's kidnapping, murder, and aggravated burglary convictions were not allied offenses. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to continue sentencing for purposes of allowing mitigation evidence from retained psychologist. The court properly instructed the jury on aggravated murder and murder, and conviction of aggravated murder was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 492×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 474×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 405×
- State v. MonroeOhio Supreme Court· 2005-05-25· cited 211×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-07-27· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.