State v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though defendant did not know victim and had spoken with him only a few minutes when shooting occurred, jury was entitled to find that a sufficiently appreciable period of time elapsed for him to form an intent and reflect upon it
• even though defendant did not know victim and had spoken with him only a few minutes when shooting occurred, jury was entitled to find that a sufficiently appreciable period of time elapsed for him to form an intent and reflect upon it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bingham
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-05-15· cited 82×
• State v. Ra
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-29· cited 34×
• State v. Huynh
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-31· cited 32×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-02-10· cited 30×
• State v. Shirley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-07-26· cited 22×
• State v. Tikka
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-16· cited 20×
• State v. Bingham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-08· cited 8×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 417×
• Ross v. Rhay
  Washington Supreme Court· 1959-04-16· cited 1×