Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he conclusion of the trial judge that there was no reversible error in the trial cannot be an adequate substitute for the right to full appellate review available to all defendants . . . who can afford the expense of a transcript\
• giving retroactivity to Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956)
• Washington Supreme Court could not deny indigent defendant's motion for a free transcript
• reaffirming that States must afford indigent defendants adequate appellate review
• provision of trial transcript may not be conditioned on approval of judge
• provision of trial transcript may not be conditioned on approval of judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).