State v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two defendants' pretrial testing conditions violated court rules and that a third defendant's pretrial testing conditions were unconstitutional
• invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County's standard condition of pretrial release
• invalidating weekly urinalysis as part of Mason County’s standard condition of pretrial release

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-21· cited 27×
• State Of Washington, V Quran D. A. Ingram
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-06· cited 22×
• State Of Washington v. Brittanie Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-24· cited 4×
• Blomstrom v. Tripp
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-10-05
• State Of Washington, V Quran D. A. Ingram
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-06-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ladson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
• State v. Rankin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-06-10· cited 161×
• United States v. Raymond Lee Scott
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-09· cited 114×
• State v. O'BREMSKI
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-02-02· cited 55×
• State v. Surge
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 47×
• State v. Surge
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-12· cited 30×
• Butler v. Kato
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-12· cited 14×