Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/30/1991
State v. Rose
Citations
- 819 P.2d 757
- 109 Or. App. 378
- 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confronting the defendant with sufficient probable cause to support an immediate arrest, along with restrictions in movement, created compelling circumstances
- the defendant was questioned in a ‘ ‘compelling setting’ ’ when she was ordered to climb out of her car and stand near the officer after she admitted that there was a weapon in the car
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Joseph, Deits
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Heise-FayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-07· cited 25×
- State v. ZelinkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-05· cited 22×
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-04· cited 19×
- State v. McAuliffeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 11×
- State v. OlivarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 4×
- State v. GaribayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-02· cited 4×
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-17· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
- State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 156×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.