Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/1/2024
State v. Rosas
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2522
Syllabus
Sufficiency Ineffective Assistance Mistrial. Burglary conviction was supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel or prejudice. Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for mistrial.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. KoleOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 263×
- State v. Davis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-04· cited 130×
- In re J.V.Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-10-30· cited 88×
- State v. Groce (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-16· cited 53×
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-30· cited 5×
- State v. ScurryOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.