Connecticut Appellate Court· 3/30/1999
State v. Rosado
Citations
- 52 Conn. App. 408
- 726 A.2d 1177
- 1999 Conn. App. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court ‘‘properly determined that there was not a complete breakdown of communication between the defendant and his counsel’’ in light of its firsthand observation of their interactions
- authentication requirement satisfied when there is suf- ficient information to establish that letter had been written pursuant to defendant’s consent or authori- zation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-07· cited 28×
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-25· cited 22×
- State v. LinarteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-15· cited 19×
- State v. CamachoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-15· cited 19×
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 18×
- State v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-22· cited 15×
- State v. OlahConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-10· cited 14×
- State v. WegmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-04· cited 14×
- State v. SpringmannConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-30· cited 10×
- State v. Robert H.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-30· cited 9×
- State v. BeallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-23· cited 8×
- State v. BlakeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-18· cited 6×
- State v. PalladinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-14· cited 3×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-11-30· cited 3×
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-20
- State v. CorverConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-06-12
- State v. Kerlyn T.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-30
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-04· cited 192×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 172×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-20· cited 115×
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 111×
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-01· cited 88×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-07-26· cited 81×
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-26· cited 78×
- Sekou v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 73×
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 73×
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 69×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-17· cited 69×
- State v. HollimanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-02-20· cited 67×
- State v. BurakSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-12-09· cited 62×
- State v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-04· cited 53×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 50×
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-08-23· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.