Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/23/1988
State v. Pierson
Citations
- 208 Conn. 683
- 546 A.2d 268
- 1988 Conn. LEXIS 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[l]ike the marital privilege or the privilege against self-incrimination an errone- ous denial of the psychiatrist-patient privilege does not infringe upon the right of any person other than the one to whom the privilege is given’’ (emphasis added)
- defendant lacks standing to challenge witness’ waiver of psychiatrist-patient privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- United Cable Television Services Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 81×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-30· cited 81×
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-26· cited 78×
- Med-Trans of Connecticut, Inc. v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 72×
- State v. IBAN C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-10-04· cited 67×
- State v. MorantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 60×
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-13· cited 55×
- State v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-09· cited 53×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. PasionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-30· cited 51×
- State v. SlimskeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-04· cited 49×
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-12· cited 44×
- Fonfara v. Reapportionment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-26· cited 34×
- State v. HeinemannSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-08· cited 28×
- State v. KemahSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-04· cited 27×
- Bongiorno Supermarket, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-11-11· cited 26×
- State v. ReinerOhio Supreme Court· 2001-11-28· cited 22×
- State v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 21×
- State v. John G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-10· cited 21×
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-30· cited 21×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court· 1970-03-03· cited 3,186×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-11-15· cited 134×
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-04-20· cited 78×
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 69×
- State v. MelvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-08-03· cited 28×
- United States v. William Maurice Foster, Jr. And Terry Lee McCreadySeventh Circuit· 1973-10-31· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 23×
- State v. RadoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-05-03· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.