Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/21/2018
State v. Ropp
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3815
Syllabus
The trial court's imposition of some maximum and some consecutive sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 1,498×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-05· cited 22×
- State v. MabraOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-29· cited 10×
- State v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-20· cited 9×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-24· cited 8×
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.