Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 2/17/1983

State v. Romero

Citations

  • 660 P.2d 715
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • oral testimony promptly transcribed and available for defendant’s challenge to probable cause
  • admitting legal evidence though seized together with illegally obtained evidence
  • “The exclusionary rule does not require the suppression of otherwise legally seized evidence merely because it was obtained in the same search as evidence illegally seized. Only the evidence that was illegally seized should be suppressed.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Gould, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.