State v. Roldan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that rules applicable to neutral court interpreters retained by the court do not apply to testimony regarding the meaning or accuracy of foreign language evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-10-30· cited 24×
• People v. Munoz-Casteneda
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05· cited 17×
• Barking Dog, Ltd. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-08-17· cited 13×
• State v. Lavoie
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-08-18· cited 9×
• State v. Lucier
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-11-30· cited 2×
• Roldan v Reilley, Warden
  D. New Hampshire· 2014-07-21· cited 2×
• State v. Lopez-Betanco
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2022-10-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Blackmer
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-01-10· cited 342×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-17· cited 325×
• United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Victor Manuel Lee Armijo, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-09-07· cited 52×
• State v. Hammond
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-08· cited 25×
• State v. Decosta
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-05-09· cited 10×
• State v. Gamester
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-05-02· cited 10×
• State v. Glodgett
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-11-26· cited 5×