State v. Roland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction because counsel agreed to an 11-member jury when one member was allowed to leave due to a family death, but defendant was not consulted
• “[T]he right of a criminal defendant to a jury trial is so fundamental that a violation of the right cannot be harmless error.”
• \[T]he right of a criminal defendant to a jury trial is so fundamental that a violation of that right cannot be harmless error.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-14· cited 39×
• State v. Kenney
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-24· cited 17×
• City of Wichita v. Bannon
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-06· cited 11×
• State v. Key
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-04-18· cited 1×
• Tony Lynn Davis v. Ron Champion and Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-04-26
• State v. Arndt
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-08-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Lane
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-31· cited 1,201×
• United States v. Virginia Erection Corporation and John P. Shields
  Fourth Circuit· 1964-08-05· cited 137×
• State v. Irving
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-04-05· cited 89×
• Wilbur Horne v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1959-02-26· cited 41×
• State v. Hood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-10-30· cited 39×
• United States v. James T. Taylor
  Sixth Circuit· 1974-06-05· cited 32×
• State v. Knapp
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-10-21· cited 32×
• State v. Ciniglio
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-10-19· cited 21×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1942-12-12· cited 11×