State v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Allstate’s practice of objecting and then responding [is] . .. confusing and evasive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Passama
  Montana Supreme Court· 1993-11-02· cited 43×
• State v. Cassill
  Montana Supreme Court· 1924-05-19· cited 34×
• State v. Kramp
  Montana Supreme Court· 1982-09-23· cited 14×
• State v. Arnold
  Montana Supreme Court· 1929-03-18· cited 12×
• State v. White
  Montana Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 11×
• State v. Hall
  Montana Supreme Court· 1976-09-23· cited 3×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Wells
  California Supreme Court· 1893-12-22· cited 88×
• People v. Mullings
  California Supreme Court· 1890-02-14· cited 46×
• James v. James
  California Supreme Court· 1899-06-05· cited 37×
• People v. Crandall
  California Supreme Court· 1899-06-17· cited 33×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 1895-12-30· cited 32×
• People v. Littlefield
  California Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 30×
• People v. Cahoon
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1891-11-20· cited 28×
• People v. Sheldon
  California Supreme Court· 1886-01-28· cited 27×
• People v. Un Dong
  California Supreme Court· 1895-02-07· cited 21×
• Leahy v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1891-03-17· cited 20×
• United States v. Conrad
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia· 1894-01-11· cited 11×
• People v. Lafuente
  California Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 10×
• State v. Trott
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1889-04-16· cited 8×
• People v. Durrant
  California Supreme Court· 1897-12-08· cited 7×