· 6/22/2010
State v. Rodriguez-Roman
Citations
- 3 A.3d 783
- 297 Conn. 66
- 2010 Conn. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- majority determined that qualifying term ‘‘including’’ modified ‘‘all of the antecedent language’’ in statute, whereas concurrence disagreed that same qualifying term did so
- majority determined that qualifying term ‘‘including’’ modified ‘‘all of the antecedent language’’ in statute, whereas concurrence disagreed that same qualifying term did so
- defendant found guilty on basis of insufficient evidence has been deprived of constitutional right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.