Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

State v. Rodriguez-Roman

Citations

  • 3 A.3d 783
  • 297 Conn. 66
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • majority determined that qualifying term ‘‘including’’ modified ‘‘all of the antecedent language’’ in statute, whereas concurrence disagreed that same qualifying term did so
  • majority determined that qualifying term ‘‘including’’ modified ‘‘all of the antecedent language’’ in statute, whereas concurrence disagreed that same qualifying term did so
  • defendant found guilty on basis of insufficient evidence has been deprived of constitutional right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.