State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5117
Syllabus
Res judicata resentencing postrelease control sufficiency of the evidence ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant's challenge to his sentence based on trial court's failure to impose a firearm specification is barred by res judicata where he could have and did previously raise the challenge. Where a trial court fails to impose postrelease control as part of a sentence, the court does not err by conducting a limited resentencing for the purpose of imposing postrelease control. A defendant's subsequent challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is res judicata where he could and did challenge the sufficiency of the evidence pursuant to direct appeal. A defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails where it is based on previously raised and rejected arguments, or where it challenges conduct that was outside the scope of representation.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1981-03-31· cited 82×
- State v. BridgesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-13· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Barker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-10-15· cited 13×
- State v. WilliamsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-23· cited 8×
- State v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.