Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/1/1992
State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 833 P.2d 1343
- 113 Or. App. 696
- 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding “that one prior crimi- nal episode will not support a finding of ‘persistent involve- ment in similar offenses’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Deits, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21· cited 19×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-31· cited 10×
- State v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 6×
- State v. CeballosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 4×
- State v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-02· cited 2×
- State v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 2×
- State v. SummerlynCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 2×
- State v. DearmittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-08· cited 2×
- State v. DearmittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-05· cited 2×
- State v. DearmittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-23· cited 2×
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 1×
- State v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-23· cited 1×
- State v. TalamantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.