State v. Rhoades

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining whether a factor constitutes a substantial and compelling reason for departure, we look at whether ‘exceptional circumstances [exist that] overcome the presumption that the [presumptive] sentence accomplishes the purposes of the guidelines.’ ”
• “In determining whether a factor constitutes a substantial and compelling reason for departure, we look at whether ‘exceptional circumstances [exist that] overcome the presumption that the [presumptive] sentence accomplishes the purposes of the guidelines.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davilla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-03· cited 12×
• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 1×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21· cited 1×
• State v. Loe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15
• State v. GALLINO
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08
• State v. Vandervort
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 80×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01· cited 16×
• State v. Watkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-12· cited 9×
• State v. Parsons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-21· cited 8×
• State v. Talamantes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 1×