State v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]arring exceptional circumstances, the only way a person can assert the privilege [against self-incrimination] is on a question-by-question basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dept. of Human Services v. F. T. R.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-30· cited 1×
• Denning v. Board of Parole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-29· cited 1×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• Hoffman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
• Rogers v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-16· cited 898×
• Mitchell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 802×
• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• State v. Kell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-03-24· cited 68×
• State v. Soriano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-13· cited 53×
• United States v. Bodwell
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-19· cited 29×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-04-20· cited 25×
• State v. Tenbusch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 19×
• State of Oregon v. Hennessey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-06-18· cited 18×
• State v. Abbott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 15×
• Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 11×
• State v. Sutterfield
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-10· cited 8×
• State v. Harper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1899-02-13· cited 8×
• State v. Shaw
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-03-17· cited 4×
• State v. Froats
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-18· cited 2×