Washington Supreme Court· 3/28/2002

State v. Rodgers

Citations

146 Wash. 2d 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court of appeals erred in not addressing the defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument even though it reversed on an alternative basis
holding that the court of appeals erred in not addressing the defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument even though it reversed on an alternative basis
observing that the court should exercise judicial restraint by declining to pass on issues of constitutional dimension if there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction
where the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction, the Double Jeopardy Clause requires reversal and remand for judgment of dismissal with prejudice
where the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction, the double jeopardy clause requires reversal and remand for judgment of dismissal with prejudice
“[A] court may not consider a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction for an offense that was not validly charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.