Skip to main content

State v. Rodarte

Citations

  • 35 P.3d 1116
  • 178 Or. App. 173
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • review- ing for legal error whether the statutory predecessor to ORS 809.409(4) and ORS 809.240 authorized the trial court to revoke the defendant’s driving privileges
  • review- ing for legal error whether the statutory predecessor to ORS 809.409(4) and ORS 809.240 authorized the trial court to revoke the defendant’s driving privileges
  • “felony conviction” in ORS 809.410(4) means a final judgment because revocation of driving privileges is analogous to civil disability
  • state did not challenge the defendant’s ability to collaterally attack the validity of the underlying administrative order because the issue was not raised in the trial court
  • ORS 161.705 requires the exercise of dis- cretion
  • ORS 161.705 requires the exercise of discre- tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.