State v. Rocha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the defendant’s incarceration leading to his failure to appear “was because of his own misconduct and is not excusable”
• stating that the defendant’s incarceration leading to his failure to appear “was because of his own misconduct and is not excusable”
• forfeiture required by statute, but forfeiture should have been set aside in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Old West Bonding Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-26· cited 36×
• State v. Bonds
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-10-30· cited 22×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-12-19· cited 15×
• State v. Hernandez
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-05-18· cited 15×
• JOHN C. v. Sargeant
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-20· cited 14×
• In Re BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-10· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Superior Court in & for County of Maricopa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-25· cited 13×
• United Bonding Insurance Co. v. State Ex Rel. Patrick
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1962-05-29· cited 7×