Skip to main content
· 9/26/2002

State v. Old West Bonding Co.

Citations

  • 56 P.3d 42
  • 203 Ariz. 468
  • 383 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
  • 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that time between defendant’s non- appearance and forfeiture hearing gives the surety “an opportunity to avoid or mitigate the forfeiture” by finding and surrendering the defendant or presenting other mitigating circumstances
  • not possible to catalog all circumstances that might bear on court's discretionary decision whether and in what amount to forfeit appearance bond
  • when a defendant is absent “due to incarceration,” that is merely one factor in deciding whether the absence was excused under Criminal Rule 7.4(c)(4)
  • “[t]o give meaningful effect to both” subsections of rule, one of which used “shall” and the other “may,” court “construe[d] the word ‘may’ . . . as having its usual discretionary meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Ehrlich, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.