· 9/26/2002
State v. Old West Bonding Co.
Citations
- 56 P.3d 42
- 203 Ariz. 468
- 383 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
- 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that time between defendant’s non- appearance and forfeiture hearing gives the surety “an opportunity to avoid or mitigate the forfeiture” by finding and surrendering the defendant or presenting other mitigating circumstances
- not possible to catalog all circumstances that might bear on court's discretionary decision whether and in what amount to forfeit appearance bond
- when a defendant is absent “due to incarceration,” that is merely one factor in deciding whether the absence was excused under Criminal Rule 7.4(c)(4)
- “[t]o give meaningful effect to both” subsections of rule, one of which used “shall” and the other “may,” court “construe[d] the word ‘may’ . . . as having its usual discretionary meaning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Ehrlich, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.