Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 4496

Syllabus

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed but this case is remanded to nunc pro tunc the sentencing judgment entry where the entry did not contain the necessary findings required by R.C. 2929.14 for the imposition of consecutive sentences.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.