State v. Robinson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5036
Syllabus
Waiver of counsel knowingly, voluntarily, intelligently sufficient inquiry nature of the charges defenses and mitigating circumstances standby counsel. Trial court did not make sufficient inquiry to determine if the defendant understood and knowingly waived his right to counsel where the court did not adequately explain the nature of the charges to the defendant, and did not discuss with him any possible defenses and mitigating circumstances. The trial court also erroneously advised the defendant that he could not ask questions of appointed standby counsel. Thus, the defendant's waiver of counsel was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court· 1976-03-31· cited 427×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-07· cited 111×
- State v. HardmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 15×
- Berea v. FerichOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-25· cited 2×
- State v. RicksOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.