Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1427

Syllabus

Crim.R. 11 does not apply to Robinson's guilty plea for physical control, and the record reflects substantial compliance with Traf.R. 10(D). Robinson did not proclaim his innocence until after the court accepted his guilty plea and imposed sentence, and no inquiry by the court was required regarding Robinson's reasons for pleading guilty, since Robinson did not enter an Alford plea. Appellant's correspondence wherein he sought to withdraw his guilty plea was insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court since he failed to properly serve the State as required by Crim.R. 49. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.