Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/29/2018
State v. Robinson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1166
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for new trial and modification of verdict/sentence. The motion was untimely and appellant did not present clear and convincing evidence that he was unavoidably prevented from filing his motion as required by Crim.R. 33(B). Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.