Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1166

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for new trial and modification of verdict/sentence. The motion was untimely and appellant did not present clear and convincing evidence that he was unavoidably prevented from filing his motion as required by Crim.R. 33(B). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.