Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/18/1996
State v. Robinson
Citations
- 468 S.E.2d 290
- 321 S.C. 286
- 1996 S.C. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that to legitimately provide services as a paralegal, one must work in conjunction with a licensed attorney, which ensures control over the paralegal's activities by making the supervising attorney responsible under Rule 5.3, RPC, Rule 407, SCACR
- stating that to legitimately provide services as a paralegal, one must work in conjunction with a licensed attorney, which ensures control over the paralegal activities by making the supervising attorney responsible under Rule 5.3, RPC, Rule 407, SCACR
- “This Court has defined the practice of law to include the preparation and filing of legal documents....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Finney, Toal, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 809×
- State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-01· cited 52×
- In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-09-21· cited 37×
- State v. DespainSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 19×
- In the Matter of EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-10-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.