Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 11/17/2006

State v. Robinson

Citations

239 S.W.3d 211
2006 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 902
2006 WL 3371411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the victim’s hearsay statement that he planned to meet a man at a particular location for a rendezvous with a girl was admissible under Rule 803(3) to prove conduct in conformity with the plan
observing that the extent of the weight placed on the defendants’ history of prior criminal convictions may well justify the imposition of the maximum sentence for all convictions
trial court’s failure to answer jury question and issue supplemental instruction regarding inability of accomplices to corroborate each other where initial jury instruction did not inform jury of this “well-settled law” constituted reversible error
trial court‘s failure to answer jury question and issue supplemental instruction regarding inability of accomplices to corroborate each other where initial jury instruction did not inform jury of this ―well-settled law‖ constituted reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Norma McGee Ogle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.