Skip to main content

State v. Robertson

Citations

  • 130 S.W.3d 842
  • 2003 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 358
  • 2003 WL 1892821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prior witness statements “could be considered as substantive evidence, rather than just for impeachment purposes,” when the defense failed to object to their being read aloud (citing State v. Smith, 24 S.W.3d 274, 280 (Tenn. 2000))
  • concluding that a police officer’s testimony regarding an out-of-court experiment with the victim’s pressure cooker was not scientific evidence requiring expert testimony and that the fact that it was presented by a lay witness goes to weight rather than admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Alan E. Glenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.