Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/10/2021

State v. Roberts

Citations

2021 Ohio 681

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: The trial court did not commit plain error by dismissing the case against defendant, after the state's witness left the courtroom before cross-examination, because the Con4frontation Clause precluded the court from considering the witness's testimony.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Crawford v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
Davis v. Alaska
Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
United States v. Robert M. Sensi
D.C. Circuit· 1989-07-11· cited 89×
State v. Burgett
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-27· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.