Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/19/2020
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3391
Syllabus
Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law, and the trial court made the necessary findings to impose consecutive sentences. As part of his plea agreement to six counts of trafficking in heroin, appellant agreed to the forfeiture of cash seized at the time of his arrest. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-20· cited 24×
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-12· cited 12×
- State v. CrimOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-14· cited 9×
- State v. LumfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.