Supreme Court of Arkansas· 10/9/2003
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 123 S.W.3d 881
- 354 Ark. 399
- 2003 Ark. LEXIS 509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “On February 7, 2002, this court issued a per curiam opinion in which we appointed Tim Buckley to abstract the brief and set out any points of error.” 14
- “On February 7, 2002, this court issued a per curiam opinion in which we appointed Tim Buckley to abstract the brief and set out any points of error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-02-14· cited 14×
- Roberts v. NorrisE.D. Arkansas· 2007-12-13· cited 11×
- Engram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-10-31· cited 7×
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-12-04· cited 6×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-03-17· cited 6×
- Karl D. Roberts v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-01-30· cited 6×
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-15· cited 4×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-12-01· cited 4×
- Karl Roberts v. Dexter PayneEighth Circuit· 2024-08-19· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.