Idaho Supreme Court· 2/11/1993
State v. Robbins
Citations
- 850 P.2d 176
- 123 Idaho 527
- 1993 Ida. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing the defendant’s claim of breach of the plea agreement under the fundamental error doctrine
- “In a number of cases after Pearce, the Supreme Court has limited the effect of the Pearce presumption.”
- “Even if [the defendant’s] sentence violated his right to due process of law as he asserts, it was not illegal in the sense the term is used in I.C.R. 35[.]”
- no reasonable likelihood of vindictiveness where different judge imposes sentence
- no reasonable likelihood of vindictiveness where different judge imposes sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Bakes, Bistline, McDevitt, Trout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-11-30· cited 413×
- State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-09-07· cited 397×
- State v. ChristiansenIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 63×
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-09-13· cited 62×
- State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 62×
- Henry M. Apperson v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyFifth Circuit· 1963-06-07· cited 31×
- Cairns v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-04-15· cited 30×
- Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-11-01· cited 28×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-09-04· cited 24×
- State v. GristIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-24· cited 21×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-09-01· cited 18×
- State v. GertschIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-04-09· cited 15×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-04-28· cited 11×
- State v. Charles Leo BakerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-05-16· cited 10×
- State v. IshIdaho Supreme Court· 2024-06-28· cited 7×
- State v. ColwellIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-11-30· cited 6×
- State v. RollinsIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-07-19· cited 5×
- State v. Cesar A. SepulvedaIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-11-03· cited 5×
- State v. Teddy Edghill SubstituteIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-01-10· cited 2×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 1,007×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 202×
- Sanchez v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-07-29· cited 184×
- State v. UrquhartIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-06-28· cited 135×
- State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-12-14· cited 128×
- United States v. Natividad Ocanas, Santiago Casiano, Jr., Ramiro Gonzalez Alvarado, Rogelio Jose De La Garza and Amadeo Uresti GarzaFifth Circuit· 1980-10-14· cited 127×
- State v. LePageIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 123×
- State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 123×
- United States v. Robert Nathaniel BrownFourth Circuit· 1974-07-18· cited 119×
- United States v. Juventino CarrilloNinth Circuit· 1983-06-24· cited 88×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PalodichukCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-07· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.