State v. Rivers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he federal wiretap statute envisions that States would be free to adopt more restrictive legislation ... but not less restrictive legislation.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manuela Villa v. Maricopa County
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-02· cited 47×
• Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-01-27· cited 28×
• State v. Otte
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-07· cited 8×
• United States v. Aisenberg
  M.D. Florida· 2003-01-31· cited 6×
• State v. Sobel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-28· cited 2×
• Cabble v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-08-24· cited 1×
• State v. Fratello
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 1×
• Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions (Financial Impact Statement)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-01-27
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. WILLIAM GRAHAM MARCELLUS HAYES, II
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-08-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Shapiro
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-03· cited 410×
• United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-03-07· cited 112×
• Commonwealth v. Birdseye
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-04· cited 44×
• In Re Grand Jury Investigation
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-12-05· cited 28×
• State v. McGillicuddy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-02-18· cited 12×
• United States v. Millstone Enterprises, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-04-18· cited 10×
• State v. Rivers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-12· cited 1×