State v. Otte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the federal wiretap statute preempts the field of wiretapping and electronic surveillance and limits the state’s authority to legislate in this area; although states are free to adopt more restrictive statutes, they cannot adopt less restrictive ones
• “[T]he target of RICO Act prosecutions will be [,] appropriately, the professional or career criminal and not non-racketeers who have committed relatively minor crimes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 53×
• Vasquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-17· cited 6×
• Vinson v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16· cited 3×
• Cobb v. Thurman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-27· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Glatzmayer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-03· cited 133×
• Gross v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-14· cited 35×
• Bowden v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Birdseye
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-18· cited 13×
• State v. Rivers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-06· cited 11×
• State v. Fratello
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 1×