State v. Rivera
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4881
Syllabus
The sentence pronounced orally by the trial court at appellant's first sentencing hearing was not a final order, so at appellant's subsequent sentencing hearing, the trial court did not err when it entered a final judgment entry of conviction that increased appellant's sentence. The three-year delay between appellant's original sentencing hearing and imposition of her sentence was wholly attributable to her failure to appear for court and did not warrant discharge. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.