State v. Rios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the amount of restitution is limited to the reasonable law enforcement expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of controlled substances for the sale of which the defendant was convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Gibbens
  First Circuit· 1994-06-01· cited 105×
• State v. Stephens
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-15· cited 52×
• Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-11-22· cited 39×
• State v. Escamilla
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-22· cited 34×
• Igbinovia v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 17×
• State v. Sequeira
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-02-16· cited 9×
• State v. Matthews
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-02-22· cited 8×
• State v. Thomas
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-02-17· cited 7×
• State v. Harris
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2009-04-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ring
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-11-09· cited 111×
• In Re Application A-16642
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 87×
• Williams v. Hjorth
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1988-10-07· cited 39×
• State v. Carlson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-10-10· cited 34×
• State v. Johnson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-01-04· cited 18×