Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/15/1997
State v. Rickard
Citations
- 947 P.2d 215
- 150 Or. App. 517
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating factors as discrete and separate would dissolve the totality of the circumstances and ignore the continuing possibility of danger
- treating factors as discrete and separate would dissolve the totality of the circumstances and ignore the continuing possibility of danger
- officer safety concerns justified seizing occupants of a vehicle and ordering them to empty their pockets where bystanders had approached the officer yelling “‘[hje’s got a gun’” while pointing at the vehicle
- where surroundings of stop demanded a quick response
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Muniz, Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz, Haselton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 20×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 17×
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 17×
- State v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-23· cited 11×
- State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-13· cited 9×
- State v. Santacruz-BetancourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 8×
- City of Portland v. WeigelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 7×
- State v. MiearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-15· cited 6×
- State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-23· cited 5×
- State v. PremsinghCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 4×
- State v. BusackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 4×
- State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-13· cited 3×
- State v. Castillo-LimaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 1×
- State v. TollCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
- State v. Villegas-VarelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-21· cited 37×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 32×
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-11· cited 12×
- State v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-08· cited 10×
- State v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-08-24· cited 8×
- State v. LumpkinOregon Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.