Skip to main content

State v. Richmond

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 2656

Syllabus

Motion to disqualify court-appointed counsel Crim.R. 11(C)/ acceptance of plea R.C. 2929.41(A)/consecutive sentences/statutory findings R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(g)(i) and (ii)/motion for jail-time credit motion to dismiss. The trial court conducted two extensive hearings on appellant's allegations against his court-appointed counsel the trial court determined that appellant was represented by competent and experienced counsel and it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny appellant's motion. Where the trial court misstated about the maximum sentence appellant could receive, it was not error. Appellant was sentenced to a term less than that which the trial court misspoke. The trial court failed to make the required findings where it imposed consecutive sentences additionally, the trial court failed to place computation of appellant's jail-time credit in its sentencing entry. Appellant's allegations failed to meet the actual prejudice standard for preindictment delay.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.