Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1/27/1997

State v. Baker

Citations

956 S.W.2d 8
1997 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that samples of person’s blood, saliva, and hair cannot become “stale.”
concluding that the trial court did not err in admitting six prior felony convictions of burglary and theft in the defendant’s trial for aggravated rape and aggravated burglary
holding that prior convictions of burglary and theft were particularly probative of credibility
stating that the \fruit of the poisonous tree\ doctrine only \requires suppressing the fruits of a defendant's statement only when the statement was obtained through actual coercion\
stating that the \fruit of the poisonous tree\ doctrine only \requires suppressing the fruits of a defendant's statement only when the statement was obtained through actual coercion\
prior convictions for burglary admissible to impeach defendant in prosecution for aggravated burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Jones, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.